EPYC 9655P vs Celeron 807UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.42 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 23.22 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $10,811 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 1 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 12x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 99,780 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.662 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 96 |
| Threads | 1 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 400 Watt |
Celeron 807UE has 3900% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 807UE is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 807UE and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
