Athlon II Neo K325 vs Celeron 570

Place in the ranking	3204	3150
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency	0.67	2.05
Architecture codename	no data	Geneva (2010)
Release date	1 April 2008 (16 years ago)	12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 570 and Athlon II Neo K325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	no data	2
Base clock speed	2.26 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1.3 GHz
Bus rate	no data	2000 MHz
L1 cache	no data	256 KB
L2 cache	no data	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 570 and Athlon II Neo K325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	S1
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 570 and Athlon II Neo K325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
PowerNow	-	+
VirusProtect	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 570 and Athlon II Neo K325 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 570 and Athlon II Neo K325 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 570 and Athlon II Neo K325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 570 0.22

Athlon II Neo K325 0.26
+18.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 570 344

Athlon II Neo K325 417
+21.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.22	0.26
Recency	1 April 2008	12 May 2010
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	12 Watt

Athlon II Neo K325 has a 18.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 158.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon II Neo K325 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 570 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 570 and Athlon II Neo K325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.