EPYC 9135 vs Celeron 4205U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4205U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.86
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+4151%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Celeron 4205U by a whopping 4151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking257196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.4217.29
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date23 January 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketIntel BGA 1528SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 4205U 0.86
EPYC 9135 36.56
+4151%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 4205U 1367
EPYC 9135 58070
+4148%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 36.56
Recency 23 January 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron 4205U has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 4151.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4205U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 4205U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4205U
Celeron 4205U
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 130 votes

Rate Celeron 4205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 4205U or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.