EPYC 9845 vs Celeron 4205U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4205U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.85
EPYC 9845
2024
160 cores / 320 threads, 390 Watt
87.23
+10162%

EPYC 9845 outperforms Celeron 4205U by a whopping 10162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25933
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.56
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.4021.33
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date23 January 2019 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$13,564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)160
Threads2320
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketIntel BGA 1528SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 4205U 0.85
EPYC 9845 87.23
+10162%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 4205U 1359
EPYC 9845 139712
+10181%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 87.23
Recency 23 January 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 160
Threads 2 320
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 390 Watt

Celeron 4205U has 2500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has a 10162.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 7900% more physical cores and 15900% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9845 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4205U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 4205U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9845 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 4205U and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4205U
Celeron 4205U
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 131 vote

Rate Celeron 4205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 4205U or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.