EPYC 7302 vs Celeron 420

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data12.72
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23$978

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size77 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA775TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 420 235
EPYC 7302 33106
+13988%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 155 Watt

Celeron 420 has 342.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7302, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 420 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7302 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and EPYC 7302, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 169 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 420 or EPYC 7302, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.