Celeron M 333 vs 220

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and Celeron M 333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	no data	Celeron M
Architecture codename	Conroe (2006−2007)	Banias (2003)
Release date	October 2007 (17 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	1.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.2 GHz	0.9 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	400 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB	no data
L2 cache	512 KB	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	130 nm
Die size	77 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	105 million	no data
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1V-1.3375V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	PBGA479	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Celeron M 333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and Celeron M 333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Celeron M 333 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	-	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	65 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	5 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and Celeron M 333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---