Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron 1017U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-3110M Core i3-3120M Core i3-3217U Core i5-3210M Core i5-3230M Core i5-3320M Core i5-3337U Core i7-3520M Core i7-3610QM Core i7-3630QM Core i7-3632QM Pentium 2020M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 FX-62 Athlon 64 LE-1620 Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95
+116%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.44

Celeron 1017U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4000+ by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25002947
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.290.47
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB512K
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size94 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023AM2
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1017U 0.95
+116%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 0.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1017U 1508
+118%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1017U 263
+34.9%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1017U 454
+25.1%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.95 0.44
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 89 Watt

Celeron 1017U has a 115.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 423.5% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 1017U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1017U is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1017U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
vs
i7-640LM Core i7 640LM
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+
vs
Pentium Dual-Core E2210 Pentium Dual Core E2210
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
vs
A9-9420 A9 9420
Xeon E5-2640 v2 Xeon E5 2640 v2
vs
i9-14900KS Core i9 14900KS
i5-4400E Core i5 4400E
vs
i7-10700 Core i7 10700
i5-4400E Core i5 4400E
vs
i3-1005G1 Core i3 1005G1
i7-6920HQ Core i7 6920HQ
vs
Ryzen 9 7845HX Ryzen 9 7845HX
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Turion 64 X2 TL-58
vs
i5-1135G7 Core i5 1135G7
i5-3470 Core i5 3470
vs
Athlon 64 3000+ Athlon 64 3000+
FX-8320E FX 8320E
vs
i7-13620H Core i7 13620H
i7-2649M Core i7 2649M
vs
Processor N200 Processor N200
i3-2310M Core i3 2310M
vs
i5-1035G7 Core i5 1035G7
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
vs
A10-5700 A10 5700

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 71 vote

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 190 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1017U or Athlon 64 X2 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.