Atom Z3770 vs Celeron 1007U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2844not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.95no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$37

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.39 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1007U 839
+14%
Atom Z3770 736

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron 1007U 1610
Atom Z3770 2212
+37.4%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2013 27 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 8 Watt

Atom Z3770 has an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 112.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U
Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 124 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1007U or Atom Z3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.