Celeron 6305 vs 1005M

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.31
+87.1%

Celeron 6305 outperforms Celeron 1005M by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27042260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency1.898.26
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Tiger Lake-U (2020)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s4 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70
Celeron 6305 1.31
+87.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1108
Celeron 6305 2080
+87.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1005M 326
Celeron 6305 750
+130%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1005M 562
Celeron 6305 1264
+125%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 1.31
Integrated graphics card 0.77 5.58
Recency 1 July 2013 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 6305 has a 87.1% higher aggregate performance score, 624.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 6305 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 251 vote

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 147 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Celeron 6305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.