EPYC 7232P vs C-70

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing C-70 and EPYC 7232P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.89
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD C-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data8.80
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

C-70 and EPYC 7232P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size75 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on C-70 and EPYC 7232P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallTR4
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-70 and EPYC 7232P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-70 and EPYC 7232P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-70 and EPYC 7232P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6290no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

C-70 315
EPYC 7232P 17731
+5529%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2012 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 120 Watt

C-70 has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7232P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between C-70 and EPYC 7232P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that C-70 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7232P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-70 and EPYC 7232P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-70
C-70
AMD EPYC 7232P
EPYC 7232P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 96 votes

Rate C-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 125 votes

Rate EPYC 7232P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-70 or EPYC 7232P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.