Apple M1 Max vs C-50
Primary details
Comparing C-50 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 526 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-50 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on C-50 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-50 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-50 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-50 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 2060 Watt |
C-50 has 22788.9% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between C-50 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-50 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
