EPYC 7H12 vs Atom x5-Z8300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8300
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.53
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.50
+8485%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by a whopping 8485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking286046
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series5x Intel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.82
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed1.44 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.84 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA592TR4
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphicsno data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes1no data
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8300 0.53
EPYC 7H12 45.50
+8485%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8300 814
EPYC 7H12 69633
+8454%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 45.50
Recency 2 March 2015 18 September 2019
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

EPYC 7H12 has a 8484.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-Z8300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8300 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Atom x5-Z8300
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8300 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.