Ryzen 7 4700U vs Atom x5-E3930

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E3930
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.61
Ryzen 7 4700U
2020
8 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
8.74
+1333%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 1333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2797893
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency8.5653.13
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date26 October 2016 (8 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache56K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296FP6
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500AMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E3930 0.61
Ryzen 7 4700U 8.74
+1333%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E3930 928
Ryzen 7 4700U 13369
+1341%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 8.74
Integrated graphics card 0.77 7.46
Recency 26 October 2016 6 January 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

Atom x5-E3930 has 150% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 4700U, on the other hand, has a 1332.8% higher aggregate performance score, 868.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 4700U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen 7 4700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Ryzen 7 4700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1325 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E3930 or Ryzen 7 4700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.