A4-3300 vs Atom x5-E3930

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E3930
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.58
A4-3300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.59
+1.7%

A4-3300 outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28192813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiency7.840.86
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296FM1
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500Radeon HD 6410D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E3930 0.58
A4-3300 0.59
+1.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E3930 928
A4-3300 942
+1.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 0.59
Recency 30 August 2014 7 September 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 65 Watt

Atom x5-E3930 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 828.6% lower power consumption.

A4-3300, on the other hand, has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300.

Be aware that Atom x5-E3930 is a notebook processor while A4-3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3930 and A4-3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930
AMD A4-3300
A4-3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 125 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E3930 or A4-3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.