Atom N2850 vs Z520
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3388 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Atom | Intel Atom |
Power efficiency | 3.79 | no data |
Architecture codename | Silverthorne (2008−2010) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
Release date | 2 April 2008 (16 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.33 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus type | FSB | no data |
Bus rate | 533.33 MT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 10 | no data |
L1 cache | 56 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 24.18 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 47 Million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.75-1.1V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | PBGA441 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 6,6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 April 2008 | 5 January 2012 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom Z520 has 200% lower power consumption.
Atom N2850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z520 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.