Celeron 1047UE vs Atom Z3770
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
Release date | 27 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $37 | $134 |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.46 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.39 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | no data | 118 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 105 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | UTFCBGA1380 | Intel BGA1023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 27 September 2013 | 20 January 2013 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 17 Watt |
Atom Z3770 has an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 112.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3770 and Celeron 1047UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.