EPYC 9375F vs Atom N475

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3354not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency1.49no data
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$5,306

Detailed specifications

Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size66 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 320 Watt

Atom N475 has 5233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N475 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N475 and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N475
Atom N475
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate Atom N475 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N475 or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.