Celeron 787 vs Atom D425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D425 and Celeron 787 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$993$107

Detailed specifications

Atom D425 and Celeron 787 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size66 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors123 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D425 and Celeron 787 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and Celeron 787. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Atom D425 and Celeron 787 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and Celeron 787 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and Celeron 787. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GB16 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D425 and Celeron 787 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D425 and Celeron 787.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2010 1 July 2011
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

Atom D425 has 100% more threads, and 70% lower power consumption.

Celeron 787, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom D425 and Celeron 787. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D425 and Celeron 787, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D425
Atom D425
Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D425 or Celeron 787, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.