EPYC 7251 vs Atom C3955

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3955
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 32 Watt
3.65
EPYC 7251
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
9.40
+158%

EPYC 7251 outperforms Atom C3955 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1500813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.942.85
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.797.41
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434$574

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7251 has 203% better value for money than Atom C3955.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Multiplier2121
L1 cache896 KB768 KB
L2 cache16 MB4 MB
L3 cache16 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310TR4
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size256 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s153.652 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes16128
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3955 3.65
EPYC 7251 9.40
+158%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3955 5803
EPYC 7251 14935
+157%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 9.40
Recency 15 August 2017 20 June 2017
Physical cores 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 120 Watt

Atom C3955 has an age advantage of 1 month, 100% more physical cores, and 275% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7251, on the other hand, has a 157.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The EPYC 7251 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3955 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3955 and EPYC 7251, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3955
Atom C3955
AMD EPYC 7251
EPYC 7251

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 121 vote

Rate EPYC 7251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3955 or EPYC 7251, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.