Ryzen 5 4600H vs Atom 330

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data19.08
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1230
L1 cache112 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB3 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C105 °C
Number of transistors94 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FP6
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Ryzen 5 4600H 14415
+3871%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom 330 542
Ryzen 5 4600H 5365
+890%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom 330 1530
Ryzen 5 4600H 32756
+2041%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 6 January 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 45 Watt

Atom 330 has 462.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 4600H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 4600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 285136 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Ryzen 5 4600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.