i3-3240T vs Athlon X4 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 750
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.65
+27.9%
Core i3-3240T
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.29

Athlon X4 750 outperforms Core i3-3240T by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20702274
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.403.49
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release dateOctober 2013 (11 years ago)3 September 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache192K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm294 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 750 1.65
+27.9%
i3-3240T 1.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 750 2625
+28.3%
i3-3240T 2046

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 1.29
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon X4 750 has a 27.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-3240T, on the other hand, has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X4 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3240T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 750 and Core i3-3240T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 750
Athlon X4 750
Intel Core i3-3240T
Core i3-3240T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate Athlon X4 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 11 votes

Rate Core i3-3240T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 750 or Core i3-3240T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.