VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoC3-M
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Nehemiah
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz200 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon Neo MV-40 102
+165%
VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 270

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
VIA C3-M C3-M-1200
C3-M C3-M-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.