Duron 700 vs Athlon 900

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 900 and Duron 700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Architecture codenameThunderbird (1999−2000)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date6 March 2000 (24 years ago)15 January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 900 and Duron 700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz0.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data7
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography180 nm180 nm
Die size102 mm2100 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors22 million25 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 900 and Duron 700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAno data
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt21.3 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 900 and Duron 700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2000 15 January 2001
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 21 Watt

Duron 700 has an age advantage of 10 months, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 900 and Duron 700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 900 and Duron 700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 900
Athlon 900
AMD Duron 700
Duron 700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 9 votes

Rate Duron 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 900 or Duron 700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.