Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 | Transmeta Crusoe |
| Architecture codename | Hawk-256 | Crusoe (2001) |
| Release date | no data | 1 June 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 266 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 55 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 36.8 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | CBGA-474 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 7 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 7 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 342.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
