Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.43
+30.3%
Athlon Neo X2 L335
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.33

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ outperforms Athlon Neo X2 L335 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon Neo X2 L335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29603071
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)2x AMD Athlon Neo
Power efficiency0.631.74
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Congo (2009)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon Neo X2 L335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon Neo X2 L335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataASB1 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon Neo X2 L335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon Neo X2 L335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon Neo X2 L335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.43
+30.3%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 0.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679
+28.4%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 529

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 1798
+55.7%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 1155

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.33
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has a 30.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon Neo X2 L335, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 261.1% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo X2 L335 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a desktop processor while Athlon Neo X2 L335 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Athlon Neo X2 L335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or Athlon Neo X2 L335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.