Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Agena (2007−2008)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data285 mm2
Number of transistorsno data450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt140 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has 115.4% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W), on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)
Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.