Athlon X2 7550 vs Athlon 64 X2 4600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4600+ and Athlon X2 7550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2943not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.65no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Kuma (2008−2009)
Release dateno dataDecember 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4600+ and Athlon X2 7550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256K128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size220 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistors154 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4600+ and Athlon X2 7550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4600+ and Athlon X2 7550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4600+ has 46.2% lower power consumption.

Athlon X2 7550, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and Athlon X2 7550. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and Athlon X2 7550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+
Athlon 64 X2 4600+
AMD Athlon X2 7550
Athlon X2 7550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 133 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 64 votes

Rate Athlon X2 7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4600+ or Athlon X2 7550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.