Pentium M 780 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium M 780 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)Pentium M
Power efficiency0.47no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)25 July 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium M 780 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHz533 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V-1.404V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium M 780 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium M 780. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium M 780 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium M 780 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium M 780. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 FX-62 2149
+130%
Pentium M 780 933

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 27 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-62 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Pentium M 780, on the other hand, has 363% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium M 780. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop processor while Pentium M 780 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium M 780, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
Intel Pentium M 780
Pentium M 780

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Pentium M 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62 or Pentium M 780, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.