Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Athlon 64 2000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 19 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.31 |
| Architecture codename | Lima (2008−2009) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | June 2008 (16 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 38 |
| Threads | 1 | 76 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 57 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 83 °C |
| Number of transistors | 122 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM2 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 38 |
| Threads | 1 | 76 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 270 Watt |
Athlon 64 2000+ has 3275% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8368, on the other hand, has 3700% more physical cores and 7500% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 2000+ is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2000+ and Xeon Platinum 8368, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
