Xeon 3065 vs Athlon 300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.43
+342%

Athlon 300U outperforms Xeon 3065 by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17712848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency15.330.80
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)no data
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFP5PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 300U 2.43
+342%
Xeon 3065 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 300U 3867
+346%
Xeon 3065 867

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 0.55
Recency 6 January 2019 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 300U has a 341.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 3065 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while Xeon 3065 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and Xeon 3065, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
Intel Xeon 3065
Xeon 3065

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 460 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Xeon 3065 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 300U or Xeon 3065, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.