Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Athlon 3000G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 155 Watt
35.99
+1176%

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 1176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1682101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.6321.97
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)no data
Release date21 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)15 (Pentadeca-Core)
Threads430
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?no data
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data46 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GB?1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes632

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 3000G 2.82
Xeon E7-8895 v2 35.99
+1176%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 3000G 4477
Xeon E7-8895 v2 57165
+1177%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.82 35.99
Recency 21 November 2019 1 January 2014
Physical cores 2 15
Threads 4 30
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 155 Watt

Athlon 3000G has an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8895 v2, on the other hand, has a 1176.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 650% more physical cores and 650% more threads.

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-8895 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Xeon E7-8895 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2
Xeon E7-8895 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2116 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 116 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8895 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or Xeon E7-8895 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.