Ultra 5 226V vs Athlon 3000G

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.88
Core Ultra 5 226V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.14
+322%

Core Ultra 5 226V outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1670646
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.6466.33
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date7 November 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache192 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB?no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3Arc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 3000G 2.88
Ultra 5 226V 12.14
+322%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 3000G 4482
Ultra 5 226V 18922
+322%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.88 12.14
Recency 7 November 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 5 226V has a 321.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 226V is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 226V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Core Ultra 5 226V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Core Ultra 5 226V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2078 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 226V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or Core Ultra 5 226V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.