Ultra 7 258V vs Celeron N4020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4020
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.97
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55
+1194%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 1194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2491619
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Gemini Lakeno data
Power efficiency15.2969.82
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate15 MHz37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency650 MHz1.95 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.44.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes64
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4020 0.97
Ultra 7 258V 12.55
+1194%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4020 1547
Ultra 7 258V 19937
+1189%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N4020 2184
Ultra 7 258V 9982
+357%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N4020 4427
Ultra 7 258V 36479
+724%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N4020 2495
Ultra 7 258V 10693
+329%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N4020 2
Ultra 7 258V 20
+1050%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N4020 127
Ultra 7 258V 1593
+1153%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N4020 74
Ultra 7 258V 270
+266%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N4020 0.94
Ultra 7 258V 3.36
+257%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Celeron N4020 1
Ultra 7 258V 7.6
+700%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Celeron N4020 766
Ultra 7 258V 8536
+1014%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N4020 836
Ultra 7 258V 9723
+1063%

Blender(-)

Celeron N4020 4064
+988%
Ultra 7 258V 374

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N4020 462
Ultra 7 258V 1973
+327%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N4020 2456
Ultra 7 258V 5553
+126%

7-Zip

Celeron N4020 4498
Ultra 7 258V 36068
+702%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N4020 80
Ultra 7 258V 270
+236%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron N4020 310
Ultra 7 258V 1670
+439%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Celeron N4020 55
Ultra 7 258V 264
+378%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 12.55
Integrated graphics card 0.87 13.29
Recency 4 November 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron N4020 has 183.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has a 1193.8% higher aggregate performance score, 1427.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1799 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4020 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.