Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 165 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.33 | no data |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 20 November 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 16 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
