Xeon Gold 6226R vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.02
+69.2%
Xeon Gold 6226R
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
16.56

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Xeon Gold 6226R by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking165398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.80
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4Intel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency29.3110.39
Architecture codenameno dataCascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cacheno data22 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.02 16.56
Recency 30 October 2024 24 February 2020
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 150 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 69.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6226R, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6226R in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6226R is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Xeon Gold 6226R
Xeon Gold 6226R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 14 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6226R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Xeon Gold 6226R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.