Xeon Gold 6226R vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms Xeon Gold 6226R by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 241 | 401 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 22.52 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Power efficiency | 52.15 | 10.43 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 24 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,300 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 29 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 22 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.07 | 16.56 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 24 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 16 |
| Threads | 10 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 150 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6226R, on the other hand, has 60% more physical cores and 220% more threads.
The M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6226R in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6226R is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 6226R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
