Xeon D-2796TE vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04
+69.1%
Xeon D-2796TE
2022
20 cores / 40 threads, 118 Watt
16.58

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Xeon D-2796TE by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking165397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.99
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency29.3313.23
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)24 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1640
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt118 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data32
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.04 16.58
Recency 30 October 2024 24 February 2022
Physical cores 16 20
Threads 16 40
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 118 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 69.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 31.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2796TE, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-2796TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2796TE is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-2796TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Xeon D-2796TE
Xeon D-2796TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2796TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Xeon D-2796TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.