Ryzen 5 8400F vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2023
11 cores / 11 threads, 27 Watt
15.61
+2%
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.30

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core outperforms Ryzen 5 8400F by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking443457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency54.6822.26
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix (2023−2024)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores11 (Undeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1112
Base clock speed2.748 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Number of transistors37000 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM5
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 15.61
+2%
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 24794
+2%
Ryzen 5 8400F 24303

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.61 15.30
Recency 30 October 2023 1 April 2024
Physical cores 11 6
Threads 11 12
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 65 Watt

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, 83.3% more physical cores, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 9.1% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F.

Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 8400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 100 votes

Rate M3 Pro 11-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 329 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Pro 11-Core or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.