N200 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms N200 by a whopping 708% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 194 | 1613 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 31.36 | 50.44 |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
M3 Max 16-Core and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | no data |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Max 16-Core and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 6 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.86 | 3.20 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 1 January 2023 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 6 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 708.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 300% more threads.
N200, on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.
The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
