Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs A8-7200P

Aggregate performance score

A8-7200P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.36
+700%
Core 2 Solo SU3500
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.17

A8-7200P outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22383268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Core 2 Solo
Power efficiency3.682.93
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Detailed specifications

A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache4096 KB3 MB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size245 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500.

PCIe version3.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 0.17
Recency 4 June 2014 1 April 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 5 Watt

A8-7200P has a 700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Solo SU3500, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

The A8-7200P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7200P and Core 2 Solo SU3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7200P
A8-7200P
Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7200P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7200P or Core 2 Solo SU3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.