N200 vs A8-6500

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.78

N200 outperforms A8-6500 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20271613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.5950.44
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)no data
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHzno data
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8570Dno data
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6500 and N200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6500 and N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and N200.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6500 1.78
N200 3.20
+79.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6500 2824
N200 5083
+80%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.78 3.20
Recency 1 June 2013 1 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

N200 has a 79.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6500 in performance tests.

Note that A8-6500 is a desktop processor while N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 108 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.