Phenom X4 9850B vs A8-6410

Aggregate performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.16
Phenom X4 9850B
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.27
+9.5%

Phenom X4 9850B outperforms A8-6410 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23902309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency7.051.22
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data285 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bAM2+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.16
Phenom X4 9850B 1.27
+9.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6410 1772
Phenom X4 9850B 1946
+9.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 1.27
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

A8-6410 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9850B, on the other hand, has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B.

Be aware that A8-6410 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9850B is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Phenom X4 9850B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
AMD Phenom X4 9850B
Phenom X4 9850B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 322 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9850B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or Phenom X4 9850B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.