i3-3217UE vs A6-8500P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-8500P
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.91
+5.8%
Core i3-3217UE
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.86

A6-8500P outperforms Core i3-3217UE by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25402573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency5.744.78
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 August 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesNot Listedunknown Dual-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD 4000
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-8500P 0.91
+5.8%
i3-3217UE 0.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-8500P 1445
+6.1%
i3-3217UE 1362

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.86
Recency 3 June 2015 1 August 2012
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

A6-8500P has a 5.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

i3-3217UE, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-8500P and Core i3-3217UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P
Intel Core i3-3217UE
Core i3-3217UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i3-3217UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-8500P or Core i3-3217UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.