Ryzen 9 4900HS vs A6-3600

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3600
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.07
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
11.93
+1015%

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms A6-3600 by a whopping 1015% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2414645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency1.5632.26
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)7 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size228 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-4266
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530DAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3600 1.07
Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.93
+1015%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3600 1697
Ryzen 9 4900HS 18943
+1016%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3600 272
Ryzen 9 4900HS 1439
+429%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3600 836
Ryzen 9 4900HS 6349
+659%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 11.93
Recency 30 June 2011 7 March 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 9 4900HS has a 1015% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3600 in performance tests.

Note that A6-3600 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 4900HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3600 and Ryzen 9 4900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3600
A6-3600
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 65 votes

Rate A6-3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 146 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3600 or Ryzen 9 4900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.