Athlon X2 QL-67 vs A6-3600
Primary details
Comparing A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2412 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | 2x AMD Athlon |
Power efficiency | 1.55 | no data |
Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Lion (2008−2009) |
Release date | 30 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 4000 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM1 | S1g2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6530D | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 30 June 2011 | 1 September 2009 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
A6-3600 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon X2 QL-67, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A6-3600 is a desktop processor while Athlon X2 QL-67 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3600 and Athlon X2 QL-67, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.