Celeron M P4600 vs A6-3410MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3410MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.83
+43.1%

A6-3410MX outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26012819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.681.51
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3410MX 0.83
+43.1%
Celeron M P4600 0.58

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-3410MX 1707
Celeron M P4600 1886
+10.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-3410MX 5568
+32.2%
Celeron M P4600 4213

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-3410MX 2414
+33.8%
Celeron M P4600 1804

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-3410MX 22.15
+54.8%
Celeron M P4600 34.29

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-3410MX 2
+59.1%
Celeron M P4600 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.83 0.58
Recency 14 June 2011 1 October 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

A6-3410MX has a 43.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M P4600, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The A6-3410MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3410MX and Celeron M P4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3410MX
A6-3410MX
Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 45 votes

Rate A6-3410MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3410MX or Celeron M P4600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.