A6-5350M vs A4-6320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96
+24.7%
A6-5350M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.77

A4-6320 outperforms A6-5350M by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6320 and A6-5350M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24982645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.392.07
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateDecember 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-6320 and A6-5350M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache96 KBno data
L2 cache1024 KB2048 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,303 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A4-6320 and A6-5350M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6320 and A6-5350M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6320 and A6-5350M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6320 and A6-5350M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3-1600
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DAMD Radeon HD 8450G
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6320 and A6-5350M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6320 and A6-5350M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11DirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6320 and A6-5350M.

PCIe version2.0Not Listed

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6320 0.96
+24.7%
A6-5350M 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6320 1530
+25.3%
A6-5350M 1221

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.77
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A4-6320 has a 24.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A6-5350M, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The A4-6320 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5350M in performance tests.

Note that A4-6320 is a desktop processor while A6-5350M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6320 and A6-5350M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6320
A4-6320
AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6320 or A6-5350M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.