A6-5350M vs A4-4020

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-4020
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.83
+3.7%

A4-4020 outperforms A6-5350M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-4020 and A6-5350M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25992630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.162.08
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateJanuary 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-4020 and A6-5350M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache96Kno data
L2 cache1 MB (shared)2048 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,303 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A4-4020 and A6-5350M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-4020 and A6-5350M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-4020 and A6-5350M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-4020 and A6-5350M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7480DAMD Radeon HD 8450G
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-4020 and A6-5350M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-4020 and A6-5350M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-4020 and A6-5350M.

PCIe version2.0Not Listed

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-4020 0.83
+3.7%
A6-5350M 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-4020 1268
+3.8%
A6-5350M 1221

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-4020 336
+7.3%
A6-5350M 313

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-4020 438
A6-5350M 444
+1.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.83 0.80
Integrated graphics card 0.72 0.88
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A4-4020 has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A6-5350M, on the other hand, has 22.2% faster integrated GPU, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-4020 and A6-5350M.

Note that A4-4020 is a desktop processor while A6-5350M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-4020 and A6-5350M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-4020
A4-4020
AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate A4-4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-4020 or A6-5350M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.