Celeron 1047UE vs A4-5150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5150M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.48
+2.1%
Celeron 1047UE
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.47

A4-5150M outperforms Celeron 1047UE by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29092927
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.302.61
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions32 nm, 0.925-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8350G (514 - 720 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5150M 0.48
+2.1%
Celeron 1047UE 0.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-5150M 765
+2.3%
Celeron 1047UE 748

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.47
Integrated graphics card 0.79 0.63
Recency 12 March 2013 20 January 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

A4-5150M has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, 25.4% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 month.

Celeron 1047UE, on the other hand, has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5150M and Celeron 1047UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5150M
A4-5150M
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Celeron 1047UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 15 votes

Rate A4-5150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 1047UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5150M or Celeron 1047UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.