A8-3550MX vs A4-3300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3300M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
A8-3550MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.06
+41.3%

A8-3550MX outperforms A4-3300M by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3300M and A8-3550MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26712432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.032.23
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)20 December 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3300M and A8-3550MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300M and A8-3550MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M and A8-3550MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300M and A8-3550MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300M and A8-3550MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300M 0.75
A8-3550MX 1.06
+41.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3300M 1186
A8-3550MX 1687
+42.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 1.06
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.89
Recency 14 June 2011 20 December 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

A4-3300M has 28.6% lower power consumption.

A8-3550MX, on the other hand, has a 41.3% higher aggregate performance score, 34.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The A8-3550MX is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300M and A8-3550MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M
AMD A8-3550MX
A8-3550MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 111 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 24 votes

Rate A8-3550MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300M or A8-3550MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.